Technical Data Bulletin 3M Personal Safety Division 234 Hearing Protection for Impulse Noise Published July 2015 Impulse noises are generally defined as sounds with short duration (less than 1 second) such as gunfire, explosions or the pop of a pneumatic nail gun. These sounds typically have an extremely fast onset and often reach very high sound pressure levels (SPL). In figure 1, for example, the sound of gunfire reaches a peak SPL of 164 decibels (dB) in the first few tenths of a millisecond then decays rapidly. By comparison, continuous noises are generally defined as sounds that have a longer duration (more than 1 second) such as most typical industrial noises, noises from vehicles and aircraft, and noise from operating power tools at work or at home. What are the Risks Associated with Impulse Noise One commonly accepted approach to assessing the health risks for people exposed to impulse noise is to measure the instantaneous peak sound pressure level (L ) rather than the average sound pressure level (L ). When peak sound pk avg levels exceed 135 dB, the risk of damage to the auditory system and other adverse health effects increases significantly. Common health effects associated with impulse noise include hearing loss, tinnitus, hyperacusis (abnormal sensitivity to loud sounds) as well as non-auditory effects such as hypertension, fatigue and other conditions related to stress. Are Hearing Protectors Effective Against Impulse Noise When properly selected and worn according to the user instructions, hearing protection devices (HPDs) help reduce exposure to both continuous noises as well as impulse noises. However, it is difficult to predict the required and/or actual hearing protection obtained during exposure to impulse noises. For gunfire, the weapon type, number of rounds fired, proper selection, fit and use of hearing protection, the proper care and condition of the hearing protectors, and other variables will impact hearing protector performance. Traditional Passive Hearing Protectors Passive hearing protectors are devices without electronic components. Traditional passive HPDs, such as roll-down foam earplugs, push-to-fit foam earplugs and earmuffs, create a physical barrier that reduces (attenuates) the sound level that reaches the wearers ears by a certain amount regardless of the sound level to which the wearer is exposed. For example, someone who selects and wears 3M E-A-Rsoft FX Earplugs correctly and obtains 33 dB of noise reduction overall would be expected to Page 1 obtain that amount of noise reduction for an 85-dB SPL exposure and at least that much or more noise reduction for a 150-dB SPL exposure. These devices are sometimes referred to as conventional or non-level-dependent hearing protectors. Passive Level-Dependent Hearing Protectors HPDs that incorporate specialized acoustic filters are often referred to as level-dependent or nonlinear. Unlike traditional passive hearing protectors, these devices create a relatively transparent barrier at low sound levels, using a tiny orifice or a thin diaphragm. The intention is for the amount of noise reduction to increase in proportion to the sound level to which the wearer is exposed. At low sound levels, below 110 dB SPL for example, these devices provide little or no attenuation, allowing the wearer to maintain better hearing ability*. However, when the wearer is exposed to very high level, short-duration impulse noises, the acoustic filters instantaneously restrict the transmission of sound into the ear by a greater amount that increases as sound level increases, to help boost the attenuation of the peak sound pressure wave, L , and reduce the exposure of the wearer. pk Some level-dependent HPDs, such as the 3M Combat Arms Earplugs, allow the wearer to switch from the impulse noise protection mode to a continuous noise protection mode by sealing the acoustic filter, thus causing the device to function as a traditional hearing protector. This can be useful when the wearer is exposed to impulse noise at certain times and continuous noise at other times. Electronic Level-Dependent Hearing Protectors These HPDs use electronic technology to maintain, and in some cases enhance, hearing ability when sound levels are low. They are often referred to as active hearing protectors. Environmental microphones (also referred to as tactical, surround, or situational-awareness microphones) on the device pick up the low-level (non-hazardous) sounds in the area around the wearer and reproduce them inside the hearing protector. Typically the wearer can control the loudness using a volume control on the device. The amount of sound that is electronically reproduced inside the HPD decreases proportionally as the sound level outside the device increases. Electronic compression is used to limit the level of the reproduced sound inside the headset to non-hazardous levels. Since the maximum attenuation provided (in the absence of electronic reproduction) is based on the physical properties of the earmuff cups or earplugs that create the acoustic seal around the ear or in the ear, these devices provide protection against both impulse and continuous noises in the same way as traditional HPDs. The big difference is the ability of electronic level-dependent HPDs to allow the wearer to hear more effectively during periods of low noise without the need to remove the device. All 3M PELTOR electronic level-dependent hearing protectors limit the sound reproduced from the environmental microphones to 82 dB SPL. In the absence of the reproduced signal (even if the active circuitry is powered off), some sound will continue to be transmitted into the ear since the barrier created by the earmuff cups or earplugs themselves has the same limitations as does a traditional HPD. In other words, even electronic level-dependent hearing protectors eventually depend on the non- electronic components to help protect the wearers hearing. *Hearing ability is a general term to describe various factors related to auditory situational awareness such as sound detection, recognition, identification, localization and communication. Page 2